New Hampshire Recount?

After a careful investigation,
I have decided against seeking a recount in New Hampshire.  I am confident that
not asking for a recount is the right decision.

I carefully considered the arguments for and against a recount
before instructing my campaign staff not to pursue it. Without a firm belief that vote fraud had taken place, and without the possibility that a
recount would have increased the chances for success of our campaign, a recount
would have diverted campaign resources, time, and energy away from crucial battles elsewhere.

We have taken concerns about vote fraud seriously.
In Iowa,
campaign volunteers carefully monitored the caucuses. Campaign staff
placed
Paul supporters in every precinct to watch and verify the voting and
count. We
had supporters phone in results from their precincts to a campaign
hotline while others ensured that those numbers were reflected on the
official display board
at the Polk County Convention Center. The numbers our caucus watchers
reported
agreed with the official tally, and both results also aligned with the
campaign’s internal polling. In relatively pro-Paul counties, our
sampling
pegged support at 11.5%. This is consistent with an overall 10% finish
for the
entire state.

In New Hampshire, while I would have hoped for a better
result than eight percent, I am convinced that vote fraud played no
role in this result. Rumors of vote fraud were investigated, and in the end
they proved to be the result of errors in early media reports that were not
reflected in the official numbers.  In one notable case, when a campaign
staff member contacted an individual who had on the evening of January 8
claimed that his vote had not been counted, the person said that he had made a
mistake and that the next morning the error in reporting on a newspaper website
had been corrected both in the media and — most importantly — in the official
tally.

Many have expressed concerns that those ballots counted by
machine yielded a 2% lower total than those counted by hand. However, machine
counted vote totals were more than 2% lower for both John McCain and Mike
Huckabee. Hand counted votes were more likely to be cast in rural areas.
Results almost always vary between urban and rural areas.

My campaign staff and I have analyzed the numbers in New
Hampshire and I have reached the conclusion that it was the high turnout — not
vote fraud or counting errors — that left us with eight percent of the
vote. Our total vote count of over 18,000 votes was
well within what we projected given the efforts of our extensive statewide
get-out-the-vote program, giving me no reason to believe that vote fraud played
any role in the results of the Granite State’s primary.

In both Iowa and New Hampshire there is much to be proud
of.  Taking both states together, I am honored that over 30,000 people
cast their vote for me — more than either Rudy Giuliani or Fred Thompson.
Unlike many other candidates’ efforts, our campaign for freedom is growing and
our message is spreading.

Now is the time to redouble our efforts. Our resources must
be spent on the upcoming primaries and caucuses, and on ensuring that, with
your help, we organize every state yet to vote with our Precinct Leaders
program.

We can’t win primaries and caucuses that have already happened — but we
can win those yet to come.   To become the Republican presidential nominee, a candidate must have 1,191 delegates.  Iowa, Wyoming and New Hampshire determined
only 32 delegates, so we have much opportunity remaining.

Today, I ask you to
join me in focusing on the battles ahead as we continue our fight for liberty and our Constitution.

Sincerely,

Ron Paul